Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282033›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Family Support Paradox: Exploring Family Support and Life Satisfaction Among Older Adults in Rural Eastern Nepal.

Isha Karmacharya, Saruna Ghimire, Lirisha Tuladhar, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Om Prakash Yadav, Sagar Prasai, Suresh Mehata, Uday Narayan Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isha KarmacharyaDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-4181
Saruna GhimireDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2662-2006
Lirisha TuladharDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4784-7252
Sabuj Kanti MistrySchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6100-6076
Om Prakash YadavMinistry of Health, Koshi Province, Biratnagar 56613, Nepal.
Sagar PrasaiMinistry of Health, Koshi Province, Biratnagar 56613, Nepal.
Suresh MehataMinistry of Health, Koshi Province, Biratnagar 56613, Nepal.
Uday Narayan YadavNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6626-1604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between family support (for daily activities and living) and life satisfaction among Nepali older adults, with an additional focus on gender differences. Data were drawn from a cross-sectional survey conducted in rural eastern Nepal through interviewing older adults aged 60 years and above. The total analytical sample for this study was 819. Life satisfaction was measured using Diener's Satisfaction with Life Scale. Binary logistic regression was employed to explore the associations between reliance on family support and life satisfaction. About 57% of older adults were satisfied with their life. Older adults who relied on family support for daily activities had 51% lower odds of being satisfied with their lives compared to those who did not require such support (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.69,

Indexed as

familial supportfamily dependencyfamily pietyNepalsubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID40282033
PMCPMC12024343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.