ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
ExAutoGP: Enhancing Genomic Prediction Stability and Interpretability with Automated Machine Learning and SHAP.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian neural networks for genomic prediction: uncertainty quantification and SNP interpretation with SHAP and GWAS.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Machine Learning and SHapley Additive exPlanation-Based Interpretation for Predicting Mastitis in Dairy Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Panomics Integration via Machine Learning Prioritizes TAF1D as a Therapeutic Vulnerability in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Advancing genome-based precision medicine: a review on machine learning applications for rare genetic disorders.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning has attracted much attention in the field of genomic prediction due to its powerful predictive capabilities, yet the lack of an explanatory nature in modeling decisions remains a major challenge. In this study, we propose a novel machine learning method, ExAutoGP, which aims to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction and enhance the transparency of the model by combining automated machine learning (AutoML) with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). To evaluate ExAutoGP's effectiveness, we designed a comparative experiment consisting of a simulated dataset and two real animal datasets. For each dataset, we applied ExAutoGP and five baseline models-Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP), BayesB, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), and Random Forest (RF). All models were trained and evaluated using five repeated five-fold cross-validation, and their performance was assessed based on both predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. The results show that ExAutoGP exhibits robust and excellent prediction performance on all datasets. In addition, the SHAP method not only effectively reveals the decision-making process of ExAutoGP and enhances its interpretability, but also identifies genetic markers closely related to the traits. This study demonstrates the strong potential of AutoML in genomic prediction, while the introduction of SHAP provides actionable biological insights. The synergy of high prediction accuracy and interpretability offers new perspectives for optimizing genomic selection strategies in livestock and poultry breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.