ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Accuracy of Detecting Degrees of Lameness in Individual Dairy Cattle Within a Herd Using Single and Multiple Changes in Behavior and Gait.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hooves, Sensors, and Signals: Precision Approaches to Automated Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- SideCow-VSS: A Video Semantic Segmentation Dataset and Benchmark for Intelligent Monitoring of Dairy Cows Health in Smart Ranch Environments.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Lameness detection in dairy cows from overhead view: high-precision keypoint localization and multi-feature fusion classification.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lameness adversely affects the welfare and productivity of dairy cows. This study quantifies and analyzes key gait characteristics of cows with varying locomotion scores, evaluating their effectiveness for lameness detection in computer vision systems while considering individual specificity. Six key characteristics-back arch, head bob, speed, step overlap, supporting phase, and hoof step time-were analyzed to assess their distribution across different locomotion scores. Through a comparative analysis of single-parameter and multiple-parameter classification models, we quantitatively demonstrated that models using multiple characteristics significantly outperformed single-parameter models, achieving an accuracy of 84% and a Macro-F1 score of 0.81, while better accounting for individual variability. Among the characteristics, step overlap, supporting phase, and back arch showed higher relative importance in the classifiers. Back arch was a strong indicator of severe lameness, while step overlap and supporting phase were more effective for detecting mild cases. A hierarchical classification approach further improved performance by minimizing the impact of less relevant characteristics. This study highlights the importance of integrating multiple gait and posture features for robust lameness detection, providing practical insights for automated systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.