ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Weighted GBLUP in Simulated Beef Cattle Populations: Impact of Reference Population, Marker Density, and Heritability.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic selection and association analyses for improving semen traits in Thai native roosters.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Incorporating GO/KEGG Functional Annotations Improves the Accuracy and Stability of Genomic Prediction Across Diverse Beef Cattle Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a technique that integrates genomic data, pedigree information, and individual phenotypes to enhance genetic improvements of economically important traits in livestock. While it has shown significant effects in dairy cattle, its efficacy in beef cattle is lower due to breed diversity and differences in reproductive structures. Therefore, this study evaluated the impact of heritability levels, marker densities, and assessment methods (such as pedigree-based BLUP, genomic BLUP, and weighted genomic BLUP) on genomic prediction accuracy across multiple beef cattle breeds through simulations. Three beef cattle populations were simulated with heritability levels set at 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 and marker densities set at 50 k and 770 k. The results showed that the predictive accuracy of PBLUP and GBLUP increased with higher heritability and larger reference populations. Increasing the marker density also improved the accuracy of genomic predictions; even a low marker density (50 k SNP) can significantly enhance the accuracy of genetic evaluation, although the size of the reference population needs to be optimized according to population structure, heritability, and the genetic architecture of the trait. Overall, integrating pedigree, genomic, and weighted SNP information can significantly improve the precision of GEBV prediction and reduce bias. In particular, the wGBLUP method demonstrated an improvement in the prediction accuracy of low-heritability traits in small but high-density marker populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.