Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281949›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Residual Feed Intake as a Behavioral, Nutritional and Economic Criterion in Poultry Production.

Anastasiya Ramankevich, Sofiia Danko, Rafał Banaszkiewicz, Kornel Kasperek, Grzegorz Zięba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anastasiya RamankevichInstitute of Biological Bases of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0629-7047
Sofiia DankoInstitute of Biological Bases of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Rafał BanaszkiewiczInstitute of Biological Bases of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Kornel KasperekInstitute of Biological Bases of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4305-8168
Grzegorz ZiębaInstitute of Biological Bases of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0358-5692

Funding

University of Life Sciences in Lublin SD.WZI.24.095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rising feed costs in the poultry industry have the greatest impact on the price of the final product. To address this issue, several indicators have been developed to assess feed efficiency. One such indicator is residual feed intake (RFI) which represents the difference between actual and expected feed consumption. A lower RFI indicates better performance, making it a valuable trait for sustainable poultry production. RFI is influenced by several factors, including metabolism, body temperature regulation, arrangement of feathers, behavior and physical activity, all of which affect energy expenditure. The trait has moderate heritability, enabling genetic improvement through selective breeding. Accurate calculation of RFI is essential for effective selection, taking into account growth and maintenance needs. Understanding these factors enables breeders to increase feed efficiency, reduce production costs and promote sustainability within the industry.

Indexed as

breedingegg productionfeed efficiencyfeed intake

Identifiers

PMID40281949
PMCPMC12024255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.