Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281939›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Analysis of the Primary Pathogenic Bacteria in Abscess Disease of Musk Deer Using Metagenomic Approaches.

Jingyao Hu, Xian An, Pengcheng Yang, Rongzeng Tan, Taoyue Chen, Jiatong Chen, Yifan Tao, Xuxin Li, Runbin Sun, Shouyun Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jingyao HuCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Xian AnCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Pengcheng YangCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Rongzeng TanCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Taoyue ChenCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Jiatong ChenCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Yifan TaoCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Xuxin LiZhangzhou Pien Tze Huang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zhangzhou 600436, China.
Runbin SunHuailai Zhiyangtianbao Technical Development Co., Ltd., Huailai, Zhangjiakou 075400, China.
Shouyun ZhangHuailai County Forestry Bureau, Huailai, Zhangjiakou 075400, China.
Shuqiang LiuCollege of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.
Liangliang YangKey Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation Grant No. 5242015Huailai Zhiyangtianbao Technical development Co., Ltd 2024HXFWBH-LSQ-01Zhangzhou Pien Tze Huang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd 2024HXFWBH-LSQ-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abscesses are among the diseases affecting the survival of captive musk deer and are difficult to identify in their early stages. In this study, metagenomic sequencing, 16S rRNA sequencing, and paraffin sectioning were used to analyze the microbiota in the abscess musk deer pus group (AMP), abscess musk deer oral group (AMO), and healthy musk deer oral group (HMO) to compare the differences in microbiota in musk deer. By detecting differences in the oral microbiota through throat swabs, we aimed to monitor the early onset of abscess disease to facilitate timely intervention and treatment. The results showed that the alpha diversity of HMO microbiota was significantly higher than that of the AMP and AMO samples. Beta diversity results indicated that there were significant differences in the bacterial communities of HMO and AMO samples, and no significant difference was found between AMO and AMP samples. A taxonomic analysis of the bacterial species indicated that differences between HMO and AMP groups were found in the

Indexed as

abscessbacterial microbiotametagenomic sequencingmusk deer

Identifiers

PMID40281939
PMCPMC12024148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.