Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281916›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Detecting Equine Gaits Through Rider-Worn Accelerometers.

Jorn Schampheleer, Anniek Eerdekens, Wout Joseph, Luc Martens, Margot Deruyck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorn SchampheleerWAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0004-7194-6298
Anniek EerdekensWAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9544-4904
Wout JosephWAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-0673
Luc MartensWAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9948-9157
Margot DeruyckWAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0816-6465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic horse gait classification offers insights into training intensity, but directsensor attachment to horses raises concerns about discomfort, behavioral disruption, andentanglement risks. To address this, our study leverages rider-centric accelerometers formovement classification. The position of a sensor, sampling frequency, and window size ofsegmented signal data have a major impact on classification accuracy in activity recognition.Yet, there are no studies that have evaluated the effect of all these factors simultaneouslyusing accelerometer data from four distinct rider locations (the knee, backbone, chest, andarm) across five riders and seven horses performing three gaits. A total of eight modelswere compared, and an LSTM-convolutional network (ConvLSTM2D) achieved the highestaccuracy, with an average accuracy of 89.72% considering four movements (halt, walk,trot, and canter). The model performed best with an interval width of four seconds anda sampling frequency of 25 Hz. Additionally, an F1-score of 86.18% was achieved andvalidated using LOSOCV (Leave One Subject Out Cross-Validation).

Indexed as

accelerometer sensoranimal activity recognitionconvolutional LSTM networkequinesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40281916
PMCPMC12024389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.