ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Artificial Intelligence in Midwifery: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Future Prospects, and Midwives' Perspectives.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Perceptions of Leveraging AI to Improve Outcomes in Maternal, Sexual, and Reproductive Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Exploratory Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Changes in artificial intelligence literacy, attitudes, and acceptance following ChatGPT-based training among midwifery students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Competency Goals in Midwifery Master's Programs in Germany and Selected OECD Countries: Comparison of Stakeholder Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Using artificial intelligence as a technological tool in gynecologic and obstetric health: A narrative literature review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.