ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ethical and Psychosocial Issues Associated with Genetic Testing for Hereditary Tumor Predisposition Syndromes.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hereditary cancer syndromes with gynecological cancer risk: focus on prevention strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Changes in life decisions and in emotions following genetic testing for cancer risk.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Precision Neuro-Oncology in Glioblastoma: AI-Guided CRISPR Editing and Real-Time Multi-Omics for Genomic Brain Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes (HTPSs) significantly increase the risk of developing various cancers, often at earlier ages than seen in the general population. The development and application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the identification of individuals with HTPS, facilitating early diagnosis, personalized risk assessment, and tailored preventive strategies. However, the widespread implementation of genetic testing for HTPS presents complex ethical and psychosocial issues. This paper examines key ethical considerations surrounding genetic testing for HTPS, including the following: the distinct nature of genetic information and its implications for families; the challenges of informed consent amidst evolving genetic knowledge and direct-to-consumer testing; the complexities of predictive and presymptomatic testing, particularly in minors; and the implications of incidental findings. It further explores the critical issue of genetic discrimination, particularly concerning insurance, employment, and social stigmatization. This paper highlights the importance of balancing individual rights, such as autonomy and privacy, with familial responsibilities and the potential benefits of early detection and intervention. It also underscores the need for robust legal frameworks, comprehensive genetic counseling, and ongoing public education to address the ethical and psychosocial challenges associated with genetic testing for HTPS, with the ultimate goal of maximizing the benefits of genomic medicine while minimizing potential harms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.