ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Deep Learning-Based Estimation of Myocardial Material Parameters from Cardiac MRI.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate estimation of myocardial material parameters is crucial to understand cardiac biomechanics and plays a key role in advancing computational modeling and clinical applications. Traditional inverse finite element (FE) methods rely on iterative optimization to infer these parameters, which is computationally expensive and time-consuming, limiting their clinical applicability.
methodsThis study proposes a deep learning-based approach to rapidly and accurately estimate the left ventricular myocardial material parameters directly from routine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) data. A ResNet18-based model was trained on FEM-derived parameters from a dataset of 1288 healthy subjects.
resultsThe proposed model demonstrated high predictive accuracy on healthy subjects, achieving mean absolute errors of 0.0146 for Ca and 0.0139 for Cb, with mean relative errors below 5.00%. Additionally, we evaluated the model on a small pathological subset (including ARV and HCM cases). The results revealed that while the model maintained strong performance on healthy data, the prediction errors in the pathological samples were higher, indicating increased challenges in modeling diseased myocardial tissue.
conclusionThis study establishes a computationally efficient and accurate deep learning framework for estimating myocardial material parameters, eliminating the need for time-consuming iterative FE optimization. While the model shows promising performance on healthy subjects, further validation and refinement are required to address its limitations in pathological conditions, thereby paving the way for personalized cardiac modeling and improved clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.