Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281791›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comparing the Efficiency of Valved Trocar Cannulas for Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

Tommaso Rossi, Giorgio Querzoli, Giov Battista Angelini, Camilla Pellizzaro, Veronica Santoro, Giulia Rosari, Mariacristina Parravano, David H Steel, Mario R Romano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tommaso RossiIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti ONLUS, 00184 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0332-7757
Giorgio QuerzoliDICAAR, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3770-6034
Giov Battista AngeliniIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti ONLUS, 00184 Roma, Italy.
Camilla PellizzaroIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti ONLUS, 00184 Roma, Italy.
Veronica SantoroIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti ONLUS, 00184 Roma, Italy.
Giulia RosariIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti ONLUS, 00184 Roma, Italy.
Mariacristina ParravanoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti ONLUS, 00184 Roma, Italy.
David H SteelNewcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8734-3089
Mario R RomanoDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the efficiency of different manufacturers' valved cannulas (23G, 25G and 27G) (Alcon, Bausch & Lomb, BVI, DORC, Optikon) in maintaining intraocular pressure during vitrectomy by measuring leak pressure and the difference between set and actual intraocular pressure, under BSS and air infusion.

methodsA BSS-filled reservoir was connected to a model eye allowing placement of leak-proof valved cannulas. A pressure sensor was interposed and the bottle height increased until leakage occurred. Air leakage was measured by connecting an air pump to different manufacturers' valved cannulas, inserted upside down to blow air against the valve with inside-out direction and immersed in soapy water to detect air bubbling.

resultsThe average BSS leaking pressure was 7.69 ± 0.77 mmHg for 23G, 9.92 ± 0.57 mmHg for 25G and 7.57 ± 0.80 mmHg for 27G. The 25G valved cannulas opened at higher pressure (

conclusionDespite significant differences, all tested valved cannulas satisfy safety criteria by keeping a surgically negligible difference between the set and actual intraocular pressure. The minimal leakage measure may act as a safety pressure damper under critical conditions.

Indexed as

flow ratehead losspars plana vitrectomyvalved trocar cannulas

Identifiers

PMID40281791
PMCPMC12025193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.