ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
ACM-Assessor: An Artificial Intelligence System for Assessing Angle Closure Mechanisms in Ultrasound Biomicroscopy.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), characterized by angle closure (AC) with insidious and irreversible progression, requires precise assessment of AC mechanisms for accurate diagnosis and treatment. This study developed an artificial intelligence system, ACM-Assessor, to evaluate AC mechanisms in ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images. A dataset of 8482 UBM images from 1160 patients was retrospectively collected. ACM-Assessor comprises models for pixel-to-physical spacing conversion, anterior chamber angle boundary segmentation, and scleral spur localization, along with three binary classification models to assess pupillary block (PB), thick peripheral iris (TPI), and anteriorly located ciliary body (ALCB). The integrated assessment model classifies AC mechanisms into pure PB, pure non-PB, multiple mechanisms (MM), and others. ACM-Assessor's evaluation encompassed external testing (2266 images), human-machine competition and assisting beginners' assessment (an independent test set of 436 images). ACM-Assessor achieved accuracies of 0.924 (PB), 0.925 (TPI), 0.947 (ALCB), and 0.839 (integrated assessment). In man-machine comparisons, the system's accuracy was comparable to experts (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.