ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Analysis of Deep Neural Networks for Automated Ulcerative Colitis Severity Assessment.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organ Segmentation with Machine Learning Models.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Serum amyloid a as a high-resolution indicator of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic and Multimodal Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUlcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by continuous inflammation of the colon and rectum. Accurate disease assessment is essential for effective treatment, with endoscopic evaluation, particularly the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), serving as a key diagnostic tool. However, MES measurement can be subjective and inconsistent, leading to variability in treatment decisions. Deep learning approaches have shown promise in providing more objective and standardized assessments of UC severity.
methodsThis study utilized publicly available endoscopic images of UC patients to analyze and compare the performance of state-of-the-art deep neural networks for automated MES classification. Several state-of-the-art architectures were tested to determine the most effective model for grading disease severity. The F1 score, accuracy, recall, and precision were calculated for all models, and statistical analysis was conducted to verify statistically significant differences between the networks.
resultsVGG19 was found to be the best-performing network, achieving a QWK score of 0.876 and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.7528 across all classes. However, the performance differences among the top-performing models were very small suggesting that selection should depend on specific deployment requirements.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that multiple state-of-the-art deep neural network architectures could automate UC severity classification. Simpler architectures were found to achieve competitive results with larger models, challenging the assumption that larger networks necessarily provide better clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.