Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281771›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Breathomics: A Non-Invasive Approach for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Hélène Yockell-Lelièvre, Romy Philip, Palash Kaushik, Ashok Prabhu Masilamani, Sarkis H Meterissian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hélène Yockell-LelièvreNoze, 4920 Pl. Olivia, Saint-Laurent, QC H4R 2Z8, Canada.
Romy PhilipDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-2616-2910
Palash KaushikNoze, 4920 Pl. Olivia, Saint-Laurent, QC H4R 2Z8, Canada.
Ashok Prabhu MasilamaniNoze, 4920 Pl. Olivia, Saint-Laurent, QC H4R 2Z8, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-2719-4453
Sarkis H MeterissianDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, underscoring the critical need for effective early detection methods to reduce mortality. Traditional detection techniques, such as mammography, present significant limitations, particularly in women with dense breast tissue, highlighting the need for alternative screening approaches. Breathomics, based on the analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) present in exhaled breath, offers a non-invasive, potentially transformative diagnostic tool. These VOCs are metabolic byproducts from various organs of the human body whose presence and varying concentrations in breath are reflective of different health conditions. This review explores the potential of breathomics, highlighting its promise as a rapid, cost-effective screening approach for breast cancer, facilitated through the integration of portable solutions like electronic noses (e-noses). Key considerations for clinical translation-including patient selection, environmental confounders, and different breath collection methods-will be examined in terms of how each of them affects the breath profile. However, there are also challenges such as patient variability in VOC signatures, and the need for standardization in breath sampling protocols. Future research should prioritize standardizing sampling and analytical procedures and validating their clinical utility through large-scale clinical trials.

Indexed as

breast cancer diagnosticsbreast cancer screeningbreath analysisbreathomicselectronic nosevolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID40281771
PMCPMC12025141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.