Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281763›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

2D Pose Estimation vs. Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Motion Capture in Ergonomics: Assessing Postural Risk in Dental Assistants.

Steven Simon, Jonna Meining, Laura Laurendi, Thorsten Berkefeld, Jonas Dully, Carlo Dindorf, Michael Fröhlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven SimonDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-0881-6791
Jonna MeiningDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Laura LaurendiDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Thorsten BerkefeldDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Jonas DullyDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6822-0697
Carlo DindorfDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-8481
Michael FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1982-6374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dental profession has a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders because daily working life is characterized by many monotonous and one-sided physical exertions. Inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based motion capture (MoCap) is increasingly utilized for assessing workplace postural risk. However, practical alternatives are needed because it is time-consuming and relatively cost intensive for ergonomists. This study compared two measurement technologies: IMU-based MoCap and a time-effective alternative, two-dimensional (2D) pose estimation. Forty-five dental assistant students (all female) were included (age: 19.56 ± 5.91 years; height: 165.00 ± 6.35 cm; weight: 63.41 ± 13.87 kg; BMI: 21.56 ± 4.63 kg/m

Indexed as

dental assistant healthergonomicsmotion captureobservational methodspose detectionwork-related discomfort

Identifiers

PMID40281763
PMCPMC12024670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.