ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Micron-Sized Fe
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- 3D-printed magnetic scaffolds promote bone and vessel regeneration through CRYAB/PI3K-AKT and NF-κB pathways identified by proteomics.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy is a critical regime in cancer treatment. The magnetic targeted drug delivery system (MTDDS) can selectively aggregate chemotherapy agents at the target areas, which has attracted great attention due to its safety, high efficiency, and minimal side effects on the human body. It would be ideal to establish a tissue engineering scaffold that can not only reconstruct the defect from the surgical tumor removal, but also serve as a magnetic station to attract MTDDS to the local site to enhance the targeted drug delivery. The current study constructed polycaprolactone magnetic tissue engineering scaffolds with various micrometer-sized magnets. The degradation properties of the scaffolds were assessed in simulated body fluid (SBF), and primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells were used to evaluate the biocompatibility of the scaffolds to osteoblast differentiations. The scaffolds were further examined by implantation to an air pouch model on the back of BALB/c mice. The in vitro data suggested that up to 40% of micron-sized magnetite can be used to formulate porous polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds with comparable biocompatibility to the PCL-alone scaffold. A mouse study revealed that the intro-peritoneal injected fluorescence-magnetic particles were collectedly enriched in the mouse air pouch tissues containing the 20% magnetic/PCL scaffolds. Histological assessment and the real-time PCR results of the air pouches confirmed the benign biocompatibility of the implanted magnetic scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.