Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281693›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Relationship Between Implant Connection and Implant Fracture: Systematic Review.

Ignacio Fernández-Asián, Daniel Torres-Lagares, María-Ángeles Serrera-Figallo, José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ignacio Fernández-AsiánDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Daniel Torres-LagaresDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9302-7138
María-Ángeles Serrera-FigalloDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
José-Luis Gutiérrez-PérezDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2624-1454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of dental implants has undergone minor modifications over the years to reduce possible future complications that may arise from implant rehabilitation. One critical element from a clinical point of view is the implant connection. Given this, the team of authors of the present study decided to biomechanically analyze the effect of implant connection obtained in a possible implant fracture through a systematic review of the published literature. To this end, a search was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases. Only finite element studies carried out in vitro and simulation studies were included, discarding clinical studies and related reviews. A total of 19 studies were obtained for analysis and complete study. The conical type is the connection design that demonstrates the best biomechanical behavior. However, there was also significant heterogeneity in the design of the studies, which translates into a substantial source of bias, as well as different types of specific designs within the conical connection. In conclusion, it was established that the design of the connection seems to play a fundamental role in the fatigue resistance of the implant when subjected to load. However, more studies are needed to determine the most optimal specific design.

Indexed as

biomechanical analysisdental implantfinite element analysisimplant fractureprosthetic connection

Identifiers

PMID40281693
PMCPMC12024248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.