Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281643›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

The central nervous system adjusts muscle synergy structure and tightly controls rollator-supported transitions between sitting and standing.

Michael Herzog, Frieder C Krafft, Janis Fiedler, Denise J Berger, Lizeth H Sloot, Andrea d'Avella, Thorsten Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael HerzogBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte Ring 15, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael.Herzog@kit.edu.
Frieder C KrafftHEiKA - Heidelberg Karlsruhe Strategic Partnership, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Janis FiedlerInstitute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Denise J BergerLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Lizeth H SlootHEiKA - Heidelberg Karlsruhe Strategic Partnership, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea d'Avella *Laboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Thorsten Stein *BioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte Ring 15, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder individuals are at risk of falling. Assistive devices like rollators help to reduce that risk, especially by compensating for decreased leg muscle strength and balance problems. Paradoxically, rollators have been found to be a fall risk as well as being difficult to use. To investigate the causes, this study examines how different levels of rollator support (no assistance, light touch, and full support) and balance demands (standard lab floor, balance pads) affect movement coordination during standing up and sitting down movements.

methodsTwenty young participants stood up and sat down while full-body kinematics and muscle activity (30 channels) were recorded. Participants stood up and sat down using different movement strategies (e.g., forward leaning, hybrid, and vertical rise standing up movement strategies). For each movement strategy, spatial and temporal muscle synergies were extracted from the muscle activity patterns. Temporal muscle synergies provided a more compact, low-dimensional representation than spatial muscle synergies, so they were subsequently clustered with k-means++. The activation duration of the temporal muscle synergies was assessed with full-width at half-maximum at the main peak. Multivariate linear mixed models were used to investigate if the muscle weightings associated with the temporal muscle synergies differed across the support conditions.

resultsThe timings of the temporal muscle synergy activations, but not the shape, differed across the movement strategies for both types of movement. Across all tasks, temporal muscle synergies showed a narrower width of activation around the time of seat-off and seat-on than at the movement start and end. No support-specific temporal muscle synergies were found, but lower limb muscle weightings decreased while upper-limb muscle weightings increased with increased support.

conclusionThe narrow shape of the temporal synergy activation profiles suggests that the central nervous system controls the movements tightly, especially around seat-off and seat-on and in challenging conditions with increased balance demands. Furthermore, rollator support increases the weightings of upper body and decreases the weightings of lower limb muscles, especially around seat-off and seat-on. Future studies may further investigate how the loss of tight movement control may cause falls in older individuals.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalanceSelf-Help DevicesSitting PositionStanding PositionAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung AdultAssistive deviceMovement primitivesMuscle synergiesRollatorSit-to-standStand-to-sitWalker

Identifiers

PMID40281643
PMCPMC12032710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.