ArticleBMC health services research2025
Research and community engagement during the COVID- 19 pandemic in a resource-limited setting: a mixed methods study with epidemic preparedness implications.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhen WHO declared the SARS-CoV- 2 respiratory virus pandemic in 2020, Uganda was unprepared to prevent and control its spread or manage the COVID- 19 and non-COVID patients. A community trial to assess the efficacy of an intensive community engagement and risk communication (CERC) was contemplated. However, a baseline assessment of the existing CERC status and the challenges of conducting community research in the early months of the pandemic was necessary.
methodsA community baseline qualitative research (in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and household conversations) was implemented in 15 parishes (6 and 9 in Kawempe and Nakawa divisions respectively) of Kampala Capital City Authority, Uganda. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 20 household heads (n = 10 in each division), 50 household conversations (n = 25 in each division), and focus group discussions (n = 10, five in each division) were conducted during the pandemic from October 2020 to February 2021.
resultsMany potential challenges to research involving CERC were identified and were categorized into three main interrelated domains: (a) implementation challenges (b) social, cultural, and political context of the research, and (c) budgetary and funding constraints.
conclusionsThe three interrelated challenges identified in this study should be considered in future plans for epidemic and pandemic preparedness. The practical application of conventional concepts like CE, risk communication, qualitative research methods must be re-examined prior to epidemics and pandemics to improve their applicability and responsiveness during complex, dynamic epidemics and pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.