ArticlePlant methods2025
DM_CorrMatch: a semi-supervised semantic segmentation framework for rapeseed flower coverage estimation using UAV imagery.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Guided Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation for Citrus Quality Evaluation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-driven advances in plant biotechnology: sharpening the edge of plant tissue culture and genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) inflorescence coverage is a crucial phenotypic parameter for assessing crop growth and estimating yield. Accurate crop cover assessment is typically performed using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in combination with semantic segmentation methods. However, the irregular and variable morphology of rapeseed inflorescences presents significant challenges in segmentation. To address these challenges, advanced methods that can improve segmentation accuracy, particularly under limited data conditions, are needed. In this study, we propose a cost-effective and high-throughput approach using a semi-supervised learning framework, DM_CorrMatch. This method enhances input images through strong and weak data augmentation techniques, while leveraging the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) to generate additional samples in data-scarce scenarios. We propose an automatic update strategy for labeled data to dilute the proportion of erroneous labels in manual segmentation. Furthermore, a novel network architecture, Mamba-Deeplabv3+, is proposed, combining the strengths of Mamba and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for both global and local feature extraction. This architecture effectively captures key inflorescence features, even under varying poses, while reducing the influence of complex backgrounds. The proposed method is validated on the Rapeseed Flower Segmentation Dataset (RFSD), which consists of 720 UAV images from the Yangluo experimental station of the Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS). The experimental results showed that our method outperforms four traditional segmentation methods and eleven deep learning methods, achieving an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.886, Precision of 0.942, and Recall of 0.940. The proposed semi-supervised learning-based method, combined with the Mamba-Deeplabv3+ architecture, demonstrates superior performance in accurately segmenting rapeseed inflorescences under challenging conditions. Our approach effectively handles complex backgrounds and various poses of inflorescences, providing a reliable tool for rapeseed flower cover estimation. This method can aid in the development of high-yield cultivars and improve crop monitoring through UAV-based technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.