Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281591›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of context at the organizational level: The Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS).

Hélène Chokron Garneau, Hannah Cheng, Jane Kim, Maryam Abdel Magid, Lia Chin-Purcell, Mark McGovern

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hélène Chokron GarneauStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine,, Palo Alto, CA, USA. hchokgar@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0113-0400
Hannah ChengStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine,, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jane KimStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine,, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Maryam Abdel MagidStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine,, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Lia Chin-PurcellStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine,, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Mark McGovernStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine,, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Transforming health equity rhetoric to rigor: Development and validation of a novel measure assessing health equity in implementation of health interventionsP50DA054072 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark P McGovern · 2022 to 2026
$18.1M
Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)R01DA052975 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JAMES H, MCGOVERN, MARK P · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
California Department of Health Care Services 18-95529NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054072NIDA NIH HHS P50DA054072NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052975NIDA NIH HHS R01DA052975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful implementation and sustainment of interventions is heavily influenced by context. Yet the complexity and dynamic nature of context make it challenging to connect and translate findings across implementation efforts. Existing methods to assess context are typically qualitative, limiting potential replicability and utility. Existing quantitative measures and the siloed nature of implementation efforts limit possibilities for data poolinXg and harmonization. The Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS) was developed to be a pragmatic, quantitative, organizational-level assessment of contextual factors. The intention is to characterize context with a measure that may enhance replication and reproducibility of findings beyond single implementation case studies. Here, we present the development and validation of the IFASIS.

methodsA literature review was conducted to identify major concepts of established theories and frameworks to be retained. IFASIS data were examined in relation to implementation outcomes gathered from two studies. Psychometric validation efforts included content and face validity, reliability, internal consistency, and predictive and concurrent validity. Predictive validity was evaluated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) for longitudinal data on three implementation outcomes: reach, effectiveness, and implementation quality. Pragmatic properties were also evaluated.

resultsThe IFASIS is a 27-item, team-based, instrument that quantitatively operationalizes context. Two rating scales capture current state and importance of each item to an organization. It demonstrated strong reliability, internal consistency, and predictive and concurrent validity. There were significant associations between higher IFASIS scores and improved implementation outcomes. A one-unit increase in total IFASIS score corresponded to a 160% increase in the number of patients receiving a medication (reach). IFASIS domains of factors outside the organization, factors within the organization, and factors about the intervention, and subscales of organizational readiness, community support, and recipient needs and values, were predictive of successful implementation outcomes. IFASIS scores were also significantly associated with measures of implementation quality.

conclusionsThe IFASIS is a psychometrically and pragmatically valid instrument to assess contextual factors in implementation endeavors. Its ability to predict key implementation outcomes and facilitate data pooling across projects suggests it can play an important role in advancing the field.

Indexed as

ContextGeneralizabilityImplementation ScienceInstrument

Identifiers

PMID40281591
PMCPMC12032751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.