Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281573›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Continuity of care during long-term care transitions: a scoping review of the Canadian literature.

Augustine Chukwuebuka Okoh, Alfina Shahu, Regis Gu, Henry Siu, Michelle Howard, Ellen Badone, Lawrence Grierson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Augustine Chukwuebuka OkohDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada. okoha@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-7332
Alfina ShahuFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Regis GuTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Henry SiuDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1593-6827
Michelle HowardDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8127-5492
Ellen BadoneDepartment of Anthropology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-6600
Lawrence GriersonDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-5976

Funding

Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation #24-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who maintain longitudinal provider-patient relationships experience better overall health outcomes. However, most older adults in Canada lose contact with their family physician when they enter long-term care (LTC) as new providers assume responsibility for their care. There is relatively little known about the contextual factors, processes, knowledge, and health professions education antecedents that promote the benefits of relational, management, and informational care continuity during LTC transitions.

methodsUsing a rigorous scoping review method, we searched multiple databases systematically to identify and scrutinize peer-reviewed articles pertaining to continuity of care during LTC transitions in Canada. Guided by Transitions Theory, two independent reviewers screened citations and extracted data. A descriptive analytical method was employed to categorize content into themes.

resultsEight articles met the inclusion criteria. Our findings confirm that instances of relational continuity are very few during LTC transitions, suggesting barriers associated with practice models and the influence of physician characteristics. Notably, the review also highlights that the involvement of interprofessional team members, patients, and their partners-in-care in transition planning could improve informational and management care continuity for patients as they move into LTC.

conclusionPatient and family involvement, provider training, and practice and funding arrangements are all critical to improving relational, management, and informational care continuity during LTC transition. We recommend more studies to understand processes and policies to optimize informational continuity as a panacea for the often-disrupted relational continuity.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareLong-Term CareCanadaHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsContinuity of careInformational continuityLong-term careManagement continuityRelational continuityTransitions

Identifiers

PMID40281573
PMCPMC12032762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.