Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281565›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Co-designing and pilot-testing an infographic to support the consent process in an adaptive platform trial for adults in ICU with community-acquired pneumonia or COVID-19: a mixed methods study within a trial (SWAT).

Heather K O'Grady, Kathy Smith, Sandra Dalziel, Barbara Dolanjski, Gyan Sandhu, Marlene Santos, Jackie Bosch, Lyn S Turkstra, Srinivas Murthy, John C Marshall and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Heather K O'GradySchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 1 C7, Canada. ogradyh@mcmaster.ca.
Kathy SmithCanadian Adaptive Platform Trial in Intensive Care (CAPTIC) Patient/Family Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sandra DalzielCanadian Adaptive Platform Trial in Intensive Care (CAPTIC) Patient/Family Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Barbara DolanjskiCanadian Adaptive Platform Trial in Intensive Care (CAPTIC) Patient/Family Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gyan SandhuSt. Michael's Hospital Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marlene SantosSt. Michael's Hospital Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jackie BoschSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 1 C7, Canada.
Lyn S TurkstraSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 1 C7, Canada.
Srinivas MurthyDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John C MarshallSt. Michael's Hospital Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michelle E KhoSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 1 C7, Canada.
Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformed consent documents educate patients and families about research participation and alternatives. However, given their length and complexity, consent documents can be challenging to understand, particularly in high-stress environments such as the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and for complex study designs such as platform trials.

methodsThis is an exploratory sequential mixed methods study-within-a-trial (SWAT) of REMAP-CAP (Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial, Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia). Phase 1: We conducted focus groups with individuals with lived experience, including ICU survivors, substitute decision makers (SDMs) and research coordinators (RCs) to refine an infographic to augment a priori REMAP-CAP consent encounters. We analyzed data using inductive content analysis. Phase 2: We piloted the infographic with patients/SDMs approached a priori to participate in REMAP-CAP, who could communicate in English, at five sites in Ontario, Canada. We assessed implementation according to 1) eligible consent encounters (number of patients/SDMs eligible for SWAT / approached for REMAP-CAP), 2) receipt of infographic (number of patients/SDMs who received the infographic / eligible consent encounters), 3) consent to participation in this SWAT by patients/SDMs (number of patients/SDMs who consented / those approached), and 4) feedback questionnaire completion (number of patients/SDMs who completed the questionnaire / those who received it).

resultsPhase 1: We conducted two, two-hour focus groups with 5 participants (10 participants total). Participants identified important infographic design considerations (visual presentation, language) and content (study details, participation in research). Integration: Results from Phase 1 were used to develop a final consent infographic. Phase 2: Sixty-three patients were eligible for REMAP-CAP during the study period; 21 were eligible (33%) for the SWAT. Of these, 18 patients/SDMs (86%) received the infographic, 17 consented to the SWAT (94%) and 15 (88%) completed questionnaires. RCs completed case report forms for each consent encounter (n = 18, 100%).

conclusionsWe engaged individuals with lived experience to co-design a consent infographic. We achieved three of four pre-specified feasibility objectives during pilot testing of the infographic for a priori REMAP-CAP consent encounters. Although there were fewer eligible consent encounters than anticipated, we identified acceptable rates of infographic delivery, consent to SWAT participation and questionnaire completion.

trial registrationThe Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT Repository (SWAT #176).

Indexed as

Co-designConsent interventionsInformed consentPatient engagementPilot trialStudy within a trialSWAT

Identifiers

PMID40281565
PMCPMC12032667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.