ArticleBMC palliative care2025
End-of-life care in rural China: the crucial role and challenges of village doctors.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It sounds unfamiliar, yet appealing": a qualitative study on perceptions of a good death and hospice care needs among older adults in remote rural China.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Healthcare resource accessibility and farmers' health in rural China: a multidimensional perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Palliative care nurses' perspectives on peer support in China: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Self-reported knowledge and difficulties towards palliative care among healthcare professionals in rural China: a cross-sectional study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Holistic Care Within an International Medical Center: A Case-Based Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveQuality hospice and palliative care are particularly challenging in rural China. This qualitative study aimed to explore the critical role of village doctors in the end-of-life care of rural China amidst challenges posed by an aging population.
methodsForty-six semistructured interviews were conducted in 38 villages across Henan and Shandong Provinces in China. Data were analyzed via thematic analysis.
resultsVillage doctors with at least five years of medical practice were recruited from the student interviewers' hometowns. Among the 46 village doctors aged 35-78 years, 32 respondents were male (69.6%), with an average duration of professional practice of 29.2 years. Five thematic findings, guided by the multidimensional supportive care needs model, were identified, including symptom management as central to end-of-life care, verbal consolation as ancillary services, the absence of spiritual care, social support and economic assistance, and a lack of informational resources and support. Village doctors have focused primarily on symptom management and basic medical care and have contended with limited resources, strict regulations on narcotic drugs, and cultural taboos against death. Serving as frontline healthcare providers, they navigated complex familial decision-making, offered indirect psychological support, and often avoided direct discussions about terminal prognoses.
conclusionDespite these challenges, village doctors' deep community roots and trusted relationships ensure continuity and cost-effective end-of-life care. Enhancing their role through improved training and policy support could markedly optimize care quality and accessibility in rural China, addressing disparities and promoting dignified care for patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.