Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281515›Full record

ArticleLipids in health and disease2025

Comparing the impact of cumulative insulin resistance surrogates exposure on stroke: optimizing prevention strategies.

Dezhi Hong, Xiaohui Li, Guotai Sheng, Hongyi Yang, Wei Wang, Yang Zou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dezhi HongDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaohui LiDepartment of Cardiology, Chongren County People's Hospital, Fuzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Guotai ShengDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Hongyi YangDiscipline Construction Office, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Wei WangJiangxi Cardiovascular Research Institute, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. wwangcvri@163.com.
Yang ZouJiangxi Cardiovascular Research Institute, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. jxyxyzy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9373-928X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670370Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20224ACB206004Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20232BAB216004Office of Education Foundation of Hebei Province of China SLRC2017046Outstanding Youth Foundations of Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province H2017206381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsulin resistance (IR) plays a major role in increasing the risk of stroke. The objective of this research is to systematically evaluate and compare the impact of cumulative exposure over time to four commonly used IR surrogates-triglyceride-glucose (CumTyG) index, metabolic score for IR (CumMetS-IR), estimated glucose disposal rate (CumeGDR) and triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (CumTG/HDL-C) ratio-on stroke risk, providing insights for optimizing monitoring strategies for primary stroke prevention.

methodsThe study population was sourced from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS2011-2018). Cumulative exposure to IR (CumIR) surrogates was calculated as the mean value of IR surrogates measured in the first and third waves of CHARLS, multiplied by the total exposure duration. The primary endpoint was incident stroke, determined through questionnaires in the third and fourth waves of CHARLS. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to estimate and compare HRs and 95% CIs for stroke across quartiles of CumIR surrogates.

resultsA total of 4,669 participants with no history of stroke at baseline were included. During a median follow-up of 6 years, 347 new stroke events (7.43%) were recorded. The incidence rates of stroke in the highest quartiles of CumTyG index, CumTG/HDL-C ratio, and CumMetS-IR, as well as the lowest quartile of CumeGDR, were 9.67%, 9.93%, 10.45%, and 13.02%, respectively. In terms of risk assessment, the multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the highest quartiles of CumTyG index, CumTG/HDL-C ratio, and CumMetS-IR and the lowest quartile of CumeGDR were associated with stroke risk, with corresponding HR (95% CI) of 1.48(1.05-2.10), 1.61(1.15-2.24), 1.72(1.21-2.43), and 3.57(2.25-5.68), respectively. In terms of event prediction, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that CumeGDR had the highest predictive accuracy for incident stroke compared with other common IR surrogates.

conclusionsIn assessing stroke risk and predicting events in middle-aged and elderly populations, cumulative exposure to eGDR demonstrates significant advantages over other common IR surrogates. Incorporating eGDR as an IR monitoring marker is recommended for primary stroke prevention.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceStrokeAgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseChinaCholesterol, HDLFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTriglyceridesBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCholesterol, HDLTriglyceridesCumeGDRCumulative exposure to insulin resistanceEstimated glucose disposal rateStroke

Identifiers

PMID40281515
PMCPMC12023373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.