Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281490›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

The interplay of ergonomic risk factor and lifestyle factors on Potter's well-being and work fatigue in Magelang's tourism village.

Indriati Paskarini, Endang Dwiyanti, Mahmudah Mahmudah, Widarjanto Widarjanto, Shani Agung Nugroho, Dayinta Annisa Syaiful

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Indriati PaskariniDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia. indriati.paskarini@fkm.unair.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3511-0408
Endang DwiyantiDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-6030
Mahmudah MahmudahDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-0847
Widarjanto WidarjantoCenter for Training and Empowerment of Village Communities, Disadvantaged Areas and Transmigration, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Shani Agung NugrohoSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Public Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2511-4405
Dayinta Annisa SyaifulDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9108-1584

Funding

Universitas Airlangga 254/UN3/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformal sector workers face high risk exposure combined with low social protection coverage, placing a significant portion of these workers in a highly vulnerable situation. Pottery crafting activities, in general, involve monotonous and repetitive work. Therefore, this research was conducted to examine the influence of ergonomic and lifestyle factors on work fatigue and well-being.

methodsThis study employed a quantitative methods for the identification and assessment of ergonomic factors, lifestyle, and their effects on work fatigue and well-being. The study sample consisted of pottery craftsmen in Karanganyar Village, Magelang, selected through simple random sampling calculations. Data analysis was performed using SmartPLS-SEM (Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling).

resultsBased on hypothesis testing results, it was found that there was an influence of ergonomic risk factor on work fatigue (p-values: 0.165) and an influence of ergonomic risk factor on well-being (p-values: 0.604). There was also an influence of lifestyle on work fatigue (p-values: 0.000) and an influence of lifestyle on well-being (p-values: 0.005).

conclusionThis study concluded that ergonomic risk factor and lifestyle had an impact on well-being, while neither of them significantly affected work fatigue.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsFatigueLife StyleAdultFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultErgonomic risk factorLifestyleWell-beingWork fatigue

Identifiers

PMID40281490
PMCPMC12023350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.