ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Development of an intervention for smoking cessation in pregnant women using a theory-based approach.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enablers and barriers to smoking cessation counselling: Experiences of midwives and pregnant smokers in the 5A-QUIT-N pilot project.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile the global prevalence of smoking during pregnancy is 1.7%, it rises to 8.1% in Europe, where it is the main modifiable risk factor for morbidity and mortality during pregnancy. However, pregnancy is a key time to implement smoking cessation interventions, as women are more likely to adopt health-promoting behaviours during this period. Despite the availability of resources (e.g. policies, tools) and strategies (e.g. nicotine replacement therapy) to address smoking, their implementation remains neither optimal nor systematic. To address this, a multi-disciplinary multi-professional team developed the 5A-QUIT-N intervention to promote smoking cessation in pregnant women, by mobilising health professionals and optimising existing resources. Rather than creating new resources, the intervention uses existing tools and strategies and better integrates them into the pregnancy monitoring process. This article describes the development and operationalisation of the 5A-QUIT-N intervention.
methodsThe development of the 5A-QUIT-N intervention involved three stages. First, its components were established according to national recommendations and a final list was validated by a scientific committee. Next, obstacles and levers that could influence their implementation and effectiveness were identified through a scoping review and semi-structured interviews. The resulting data were then used to design the first version of the intervention.
resultsFindings from the literature and field experiences highlighted the need for better mobilisation and coordination of the existing resources. The 5A-QUIT-N intervention was developed to address these issues by improving resource organisation within each region. At the clinical level, it aims to enhance healthcare professionals' skills in smoking cessation practices using existing resources. At the organisational level, it promotes closer coordination between perinatal and smoking cessation professionals. The involvement of local stakeholders and local resources is an integral part of the intervention, as these vary from one region to another.
conclusionThis intervention was made possible thanks to the combination of a literature search, a qualitative study, and commitment from stakeholders from grassroots level upwards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.