ArticleBMC public health2025
Disparities in cigarette smoking and the health of marginalized populations in the U.S.: a simulation analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmet Health-Related Social Needs Among Black Adults Who Smoke.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- 'Light at the end of the tunnel': reactions to targeted and generally applicable reduced nicotine policy messages among priority populations of people who smoke.Tobacco control · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of strategies aiming to increase smoking cessation rates among people experiencing homelessness: A scoping review.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
- Tobacco use trends in South Korea, 2013-2023: Persistent disparities and emerging challenges in a repeated cross-sectional study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- SimSmoke simulation models by educational status: past and future US trends and the potential role of policy.Tobacco control · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPeople with low socioeconomic status (SES) or serious psychological distress (SPD) in the U.S. face ongoing and future disparities in tobacco smoking. We sought to estimate how smoking disparities contribute to disparities in life expectancy and aggregate life-years in these marginalized subpopulations.
methodsWe used the Simulation of Tobacco and Nicotine Outcomes and Policy (STOP) microsimulation model to project life expectancy as a function of subpopulation (low SES, higher SES, SPD, or non-SPD) and cigarette smoking status. Low SES was defined as having at least one of the following: income below poverty, less than high school education, or Medicaid insurance. Higher SES individuals belonged to none of these categories. SPD was defined as Kessler-6 score ≥ 13; non-SPD was a Kessler-6 score < 13. To project individual life expectancy losses from smoking, we simulated 40-year-olds stratified by gender, subpopulation (by SES or by SPD, with no change), and smoking status (current/never, with no change). To project time to reach 5% cigarette smoking prevalence (U.S.) - reflecting one tobacco "endgame" threshold - in each subpopulation, we simulated the entire subpopulations of people with low SES, higher SES, SPD, and non-SPD, incorporating corresponding distributions of gender, age, and smoking status and accounting for changes in smoking behaviors and secular smoking trends. We then estimated total life-years accumulated under status quo and alternate scenarios in which smoking dynamics in the marginalized subpopulations matched those of their less marginalized counterparts.
resultsThe model showed that, for individuals with low SES or SPD, smoking is associated with substantial loss of life expectancy (9.8-11.5y). Marginalized subpopulations would reach 5% smoking prevalence 20y (low SES) and 17y (SPD) sooner if smoking trends mirrored their less marginalized counterparts; these differences result in 5.3 million (low SES) and 966,000 (SPD) excess life-years lost over 40y.
conclusionsDifferences in cigarette smoking portend substantial ongoing and future disparities in life expectancy and time to reach 5% smoking prevalence. Reducing tobacco-related disparities in the U.S. will require an explicitly equity-focused vision, and the tobacco endgame will only be truly achieved when it includes all groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.