Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281456›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Artificial intelligence based vision transformer application for grading histopathological images of oral epithelial dysplasia: a step towards AI-driven diagnosis.

Mahdi Hadilou, Nazanin Mahdavi, Elham Keykha, Ali Ghofrani, Elahe Tahmasebi, Masoud Arabfard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Transformer-based models in dentistry: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahdi HadilouResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9018-3450
Nazanin MahdaviDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-1580
Elham KeykhaResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, School of Dentistry, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Dr.keykha@chmail.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-9613
Ali GhofraniStudent Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-3768
Elahe TahmasebiResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, School of Dentistry, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-6044
Masoud ArabfardChemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-613X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to classify dysplastic and healthy oral epithelial histopathological images, according to WHO and binary grading systems, using the Vision Transformer (ViT) deep learning algorithm-a state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach and compare it with established Convolutional Neural Network models (VGG16 and ConvNet).

methodsA total of 218 histopathological slide images were collected from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology at Tehran University of Medical Sciences archive and combined with two online databases. Two oral pathologists independently labeled the images based on the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) grading system (mild, moderate and severe), the binary grading system (low risk and high risk), including an additional normal tissue class. After preprocessing, the images were fed to the ViT, VGG16 and ConvNet models.

resultsImage preprocessing yielded 2,545 low-risk, 2,054 high-risk, 726 mild, 831 moderate, 449 severe, and 937 normal tissue patches. The proposed ViT model outperformed both CNNs with the accuracy of 94% (VGG16:86% and ConvNet: 88%) in 3-class scenario and 97% (VGG16:79% and ConvNet: 88%) in 4-class scenario.

conclusionsThe ViT model successfully classified oral epithelial dysplastic tissues with a high accuracy, paving the way for AI to serve as an adjunct or independent tool alongside oral and maxillofacial pathologists for detecting and grading oral epithelial dysplasia.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeoplasm GradingNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial IntelligenceDeep learningHistopathological imagesOral epithelial dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID40281456
PMCPMC12032748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.