ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Comparison of the morphological and physiological characteristics of diploid and tetraploid Luculia pinceana Hook.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of genome duplication on agronomically valuable traits in Ribes nigrum L.: a morpho-anatomical, physiological and cytogenetic evaluation.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Divergence of the Chloride Channel (CLC) Gene Family in Autotetraploid Alfalfa (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Induction of autotetraploid and morphological, anatomical, and cytological studies of Trichosanthes cucumerina Linn.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the physiological and biochemical differences between different ploidy Luculia pinceana Hook. varieties and to obtain germplasm resources with excellent horticultural characteristics and strong resistance, we analysed and compared the morphological characteristics, photosynthetic properties, and physiological indices of diploid and tetraploid L. pinceana.
results(1) Tetraploid L. pinceana exhibited distinct polyploid characteristics, including a smaller plant, rounder, thicker, and darker green leaves, as well as coarser and longer leaf and stem hairs. Moreover, the flowers of tetraploids are relatively large, and the diameters of the flowers, the lengths of the corolla tubes and the lengths of the pistils are all extremely significantly greater than those of diploids. Compared with those of tetraploids, the leaf width and thickness of the diploid plants increased by 16.38% and 14.71%, respectively, whereas the leaf length, leaf area, and plant height decreased by 21.20%, 3.46%, and 54.86%, respectively. (2) The diurnal variation curve of photosynthesis in L. pinceana was unimodal, reaching a maximum value at approximately 10:00. Compared with diploid plants, tetraploid plants presented a significantly greater maximum net photosynthetic rate (P
conclusionThese results demonstrate that the tetraploid L. pinceana has greater ornamental value, fertility and resistance. It is an excellent breeding material for the germplasm resources of L. pinceana and provides a material basis for the cultivation of new varieties of L. pinceana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.