Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281413›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Barriers to the use of direct access according to allied health professionals; an exploration among Dutch physiotherapists, dietitians, and health insurers.

Laura J Damen, Britt Beerman, W M Meijer, B J Knottnerus, J D De Jong, L H D Van Tuyl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura J DamenNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands. l.damen@nivel.nl.
Britt BeermanNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands. b.beerman@nivel.nl.
W M MeijerNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
B J KnottnerusNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J D De JongNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
L H D Van TuylNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeneral practices experience high workloads and increasing volume of patients. But not all patients require GP care. We previously reported that GPs observed that allied health professionals frequently request referrals even when patients initially seek direct access to care. This study, therefore, explored the barriers to the use of direct access as identified by allied health professionals and health insurers.

methodsSeventeen in-depth interviews were conducted comprising six dietitians, seven physiotherapists, and four health insurers. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the qualitative research principles of thematic analysis.

resultsThe main key themes that derived from the interviews included: (1) policy, (2) motivation, and (3) public profile, which were further subdivided into sub-themes. While health insurers claimed to not impose any specific requirements for the use of direct access, allied health professionals faced several policy-related challenges with direct access. For instance, dietitians reported reduced treatment time under direct access and claimed lower reimbursement for intake appointments compared to those following referrals-an assertion denied by insurers. Other reasons for not using direct access include greater uncertainty about potentially overlooking health issues during the initial intake. Additionally, some physiotherapists and dietitians perceive direct access as less convenient than obtaining a referral, for example as it involves fewer regulations from health insurers and therefore saves time. Public profile also played a role in the use of direct access. Dietitians noted limited patient awareness of their services and the availability of direct access, unlike physiotherapists, who benefited from public campaigns and effective management strategies.

conclusionsDespite the small sample size, this study showed a gap between the perspectives of allied health professionals and the health insurers that need to be further explored. Direct access has inadvertently increased the workload for some allied health professionals, particularly dietitians. This is an unintended outcome of a system intended, ironically, to reduce pressure on care. The use of direct access could be improved by carrying out further investigations and addressing the challenges faced by allied health professionals.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityInsurance CarriersInsurance, HealthNutritionistsPhysical TherapistsAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNetherlandsQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationAllied health professionalsDirect accessHealthcare systemPrimary careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40281413
PMCPMC12032724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.