Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Assessing artificial intelligence-generated patient discharge information for the emergency department: a pilot study.

Ruben De Rouck, Evy Wille, Allison Gilbert, Nick Vermeersch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruben De RouckAZ Sint Maria Halle, Ziekenhuislaan 100, Halle, 1500, Belgium. ruben.de.rouck@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-6864
Evy WilleDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2453-4074
Allison GilbertChair of AI and Digital Medicine, University of Mons, Place du Parc 20, Mons, 7000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1492-7424
Nick VermeerschAZ Sint Maria Halle, Ziekenhuislaan 100, Halle, 1500, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective patient discharge information (PDI) in emergency departments (EDs) is vital and often more crucial than the diagnosis itself. Patients who are well informed at discharge tend to be more satisfied and experience better health outcomes. The combination of written and verbal instructions tends to improve patient recall. However, creating written discharge materials is both time-consuming and costly. With the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LMMs), there is potential for the efficient production of patient discharge documents. This study aimed to investigate several predefined key performance indicators (KPIs) of AI-generated patient discharge information.

methodsThis study focused on three significant patients' complaints in the ED: nonspecific abdominal pain, nonspecific low back pain, and fever in children. To generate the brochures, we used an English query for ChatGPT using the GPT-4 LLM and DeepL software to translate the brochures to Dutch. Five KPIs were defined to assess these PDI brochures: quality, accessibility, clarity, correctness and usability. The brochures were evaluated for each KPI by 8 experienced emergency physicians using a rating scale from 1 (very poor) to 10 (excellent). To quantify the readability of the brochures, frequently used indices were employed: the Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Coleman-Liau Index on the translated text.

resultsThe brochures generated by ChatGPT/GPT-4 were well received, scoring an average of 7 to 8 out of 10 across all evaluated aspects. However, the results also indicated a need for some revisions to perfect these documents. Readability analysis indicated that brochures require high school- to college-level comprehension, but this is likely an overestimation due to context-specific reasons as well as features inherent to the Dutch language.

conclusionOur findings indicate that AI tools such as LLM could represent a new opportunity to quickly produce patient discharge information brochures. However, human review and editing are essential to ensure accurate and reliable information. A follow-up study with more topics and validation in the intended population is necessary to assess their performance.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEmergency departmentLarge Language modelPatient discharge informationReadability

Identifiers

PMID40281395
PMCPMC12023409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.