Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281369›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Lexical decision times for nouns from the Croatian Psycholinguistic Database.

Denis Vlašiček, Francesca Dumančić, Mirjana Tonković

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Denis VlašičekDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 3, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. dvlasice@m.ffzg.hr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1925-6818
Francesca DumančićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 3, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-1726
Mirjana TonkovićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 3, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-175X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Megastudies are one of the tools that researchers in psychology and linguistics use when investigating various language phenomena. This study presents an analysis of the association between word length, subjective frequency, concreteness and age of acquisition ratings, and reaction times in a visual lexical decision task. Using a megastudy paradigm, we collected data on 2614 Croatian nouns from a total of 92 participants. The results of the analyses conducted on the dataset mostly confirm the findings of previous research - shorter lexical decision times are associated with more frequent words, shorter words, and words acquired earlier in life. Findings on the association between lexical decision times and word concreteness are mixed. Both reaction-level and aggregate data related to the study have been made freely available to the public. The datasets contain lexical decision times as well as variables available from the Croatian Psycholinguistic Database.

Indexed as

Decision MakingLanguagePsycholinguisticsReaction TimeAdultCroatiaDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleVocabularyYoung AdultAge of acquisitionConcretenessCroatian nounsLexical decision taskSubjective frequencyWord length

Identifiers

PMID40281369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.