ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Chinese character size test: Test development, validation, and standards-referenced norms for Chinese primary students.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognizing Chinese characters is a fundamental skill that is crucial for later reading development and basic educational achievement in China. However, there is currently a lack of published tests or norms that provide adequate feedback on children's character size development. To address this gap, we developed the Chinese character size test (CCST) for Mandarin Chinese students in grades 1-6. To address the need for resource-efficient assessment, longitudinal tracking precision, and curriculum-aligned interpretation, we applied rigorous test development processes, vertical test equating, and the item response theory framework to measure children's character size development throughout primary grades. A comprehensive evaluation of the CCST's psychometric properties yielded satisfying results, including item statistics, test reliability, inferential score reliability, criterion-related validity, and empirical validity. Normative data from a representative sample of 7,459 primary school students in Beijing were analyzed to construct the norm-referenced and criterion-referenced character size scores. The results indicated that the mean character sizes of primary students in grades 1-6 were 1,227, 1,898, 2,422, 2,722, 2,932, and 3,060 characters, respectively, and that approximately 5.1% of the students in grades 3-6 failed to achieve the required character size level by the national curriculum criterion. In conclusion, the CCST is a child-friendly, highly interpretable, and open-access instrument with strong psychometric quality and comprehensive scoring feedback. This work would interest a wide range of users, including researchers, educators, and practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40281368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.