ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer and corresponding targeted treatment strategies.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary Biliary Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review of Surgical Management, Oncologic Outcomes and Implications for Personalized Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- CBC3T-3: a novel patient-derived cisplatin-resistant distal cholangiocarcinoma cell line harboring multiple TP53 missense mutations.Human cell · 2026Article
- Case Report: Response to ivosidenib in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: a clinical perspective with illustrative cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Metabolic collusion driving immune evasion in cholangiocarcinoma: unmasking the dual control of the immuno-metabolic microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for inoperable primary and recurrent cholangiocarcinoma: A single-institution retrospective analysis.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are classified on the basis of their anatomical origin, and the feasibility of surgical resection depends on the tumor location and extent of progression. However, for unresectable BTCs, systemic therapy has been uniformly applied. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) therapy and GC-based therapies were established as the first-line standard BTC treatment. However, no highly effective second-line therapy has been established, and the prognosis remains poor, highlighting the need for further therapeutic advancements. Meanwhile, the era of precision medicine has expanded the use of genetic testing, leading to the identification of actionable molecular targets in BTC. Several targeted therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and IDH1 inhibitors, have been developed, offering new second-line treatment options and the potential for first-line use in appropriate cases. Notably, the frequency of these genetic alterations varies depending on the tumor location, demonstrating the molecular heterogeneity of BTC. Therefore, it has been recognized that a tailored treatment approach for each BTC patient may be more effective than uniform systemic therapy. Consequently, although routine genetic testing before initiating systemic treatment is currently limited by the medical environment (e.g., cost, accessibility, regional differences), it is recommended in ESMO guideline and might be increasingly advocated. However, BTC harbors a wide range of genetic alterations, and numerous targeted therapies are being developed accordingly. This review provides an overview of the reported genetic alterations in BTC, the frequencies of these alterations, and the corresponding targeted therapies, emphasizing the evolving role of precision medicine in BTC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.