ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Harnessing advanced large language models in otolaryngology board examinations: an investigation using python and application programming interfaces.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to explore the capabilities of advanced large language models (LLMs), including OpenAI's GPT-4 variants, Google's Gemini series, and Anthropic's Claude series, in addressing highly specialized otolaryngology board examination questions. Additionally, the study included a longitudinal assessment of GPT-3.5 Turbo, which was evaluated using the same set of questions one year ago to identify changes in its performance over time.
methodsWe utilized a question bank comprising 2,576 multiple-choice and single-choice questions from a German online education platform tailored for otolaryngology board certification preparation. The questions were submitted to 11 different LLMs, including GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4 variants, Gemini models, and Claude models, through Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) using Python scripts, facilitating efficient data collection and processing.
resultsGPT-4o demonstrated the highest accuracy among all models, particularly excelling in categories such as allergology and head and neck tumors. While the Claude models showed competitive performance, they generally lagged behind the GPT-4 variants. A comparison of GPT-3.5 Turbo's performance revealed a significant decline in accuracy over the past year. Newer LLMs displayed varied performance levels, with single-choice questions consistently yielding higher accuracy than multiple-choice questions across all models.
conclusionWhile newer LLMs show strong potential in addressing specialized medical content, the observed decline in GPT-3.5 Turbo's performance over time underscores the necessity for continuous evaluation. This study highlights the critical need for ongoing optimization and efficient API usage to improve LLMs potential for applications in medical education and certification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.