Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281259›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning approach for optimizing usability of healthcare websites.

Amandeep Kaur, Jaswinder Singh, Satinder Kaur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amandeep KaurDept. of Computer Science, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India. Amandeeprsh.cs@gndu.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1660-2500
Jaswinder SinghDept. of Computer Science, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Satinder KaurDept. of Computer Engineering and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In today's digital era, hospital websites serve as crucial informational resources, providing patients with easy access to medical services. Ensuring the usability of these websites is essential, as it directly impacts users' ability to navigate and retrieve vital medical information. Despite the recognized importance of website usability in the healthcare sector, there is a notable lack of empirical studies leveraging machine learning to assess this usability. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the user-friendliness of hospital websites using machine learning models, including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Ridge Regression, and Support Vector Regression. The dataset used in this analysis was generated by a custom-built automated tool developed by the author, which assessed the usability of 100 hospital websites. Among the models, Random Forest Regression and Ridge Regression demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving an accuracy rate of 98% and 87% respectively. Key metrics such as R-square, Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Explained Variance Score (EVS) confirmed the model's predictive accuracy. Cross-validation further highlighted the robustness of Ridge Regression exhibiting low overfitting. The importance rankings consistently underscored the critical role of overall usability in predicting website performance. The study recommends expanding the dataset to include a broader range of healthcare websites, integrating user interaction data, and exploring advanced analytical techniques like deep learning to enhance future usability assessments. These advancements could lead to optimized website design and improved digital healthcare experiences for a diverse range of users.

Indexed as

InternetMachine LearningDelivery of Health CareHumansUser-Computer InterfaceHealthcareMachine learningRegression algorithmsUsabilityWebsite quality

Identifiers

PMID40281259
PMCPMC12032034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.