ArticleScientific reports2025
Establishment and genetic characterization of zebrafish RW line.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of teratogen-induced malformations and gene expression across zebrafish strains in early development.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Trans-Synaptic Virus Tracing Reveals Reciprocal Connections of the Interpeduncular Nucleus With the Mood, Exteroceptive, Interoceptive, and Motor Control Systems.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zebrafish have emerged as an alternative vertebrate model for both basic and applied science. While two zebrafish lines, AB and TU, have been extensively used, recent studies suggest that complex behaviors and susceptibility to adult phenotypes vary among lines. Given the increasing demand across diverse research fields, establishing a phylogenetically distinct wild-type zebrafish line without deleterious genetic variants would greatly benefit the research community. In this study, we documented the establishment of the RIKEN Wild-type (RW) line and conducted comparative genome analyses to investigate the genetic characteristics of various wild-type zebrafish lines such as AB, TU, TL, WIK, SAT, NHGRI-1, PET, *AB, IND, M-AB and IM with a particular focus on the genetic characterization of the RW line. We identified numerous genetic variants in each line that may affect coding proteins, some of which are unique to each line, conferring specific genetic traits. Notably, the RW line was found to carry such genetic variants in 13 genes. Furthermore, our phylogenetic analysis revealed that the RW line is genetically distinct from other commonly used lines. Collectively, the RW line is a robust zebrafish line with excellent breeding characteristics, making it valuable for studies exploring genetic diversity and line-specific traits within the species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.