ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Dissecting clinical features of COVID-19 in a cohort of 21,312 acute care patients.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of 977 Long COVID Patients Reveals Prevalent Neuropathy and Association with Anti-Ganglioside Antibodies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough, COVID-19 has resulted in over 7 million deaths globally, many questions still remain about the risk factors for disease severity and the effects of variants and vaccinations over the course of the pandemic. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from COVID-19 patients over 2.5 years of the COVID-19 pandemic to identify associated clinical features.
methodsWe analyze a retrospective cohort of 21,312 acute-care patients over a 2.5 year period and define six clinical trajectory groups (TGs) associated with demographics, diagnoses, vitals, labs, imaging, consultations, and medications.
resultsWe show that the proportion of mild patients increased over time, particularly during Omicron waves. Additionally, while mild and fatal patients had differences in age, age did not distinguish patients with severe versus critical disease. Furthermore, we find that both male sex and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity are associated with more severe/critical TGs. More severe patients also have a higher rate of neuropsychiatric diagnoses and consultations, along with an immunological signature of high neutrophils and immature granulocytes, and low lymphocytes and monocytes. Interestingly, low albumin is one of the best lab predictors of COVID-19 severity in association with higher malnutrition in severe/critical patients, raising concern of nutritional insufficiency influencing COVID-19 outcomes. Despite this, only a small fraction of severe/critical patients had nutritional labs checked (e.g. Vitamin D, thiamine, B vitamins) or received vitamin supplementation.
conclusionsOur findings expand on clinical risk factors in COVID-19, and highlight the interaction between severity, nutritional status, and neuropsychiatric complications in acute care patients to enable identification of patients at risk for severe disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.