ArticleScientific reports2025
Natural averaging may complement known biological constraints in sexual reproduction's advantages over asexual in conserving species quantitative traits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex Determination in Sponges.Molecular reproduction and development · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Commonly recognized effects of sexual reproduction include increased diversity, improved adaptability, enabling of DNA repair, constrained accumulation of deleterious mutations, and species genotype homogenization. Additionally, there are studies that show how sexual reproduction slows down certain evolutionary responses, offering advantages in population cumulative growth and stability over time and other metrics. Here, we contribute an observation of another distinct effect of sexual reproduction, focusing on retaining a species's key traits. In an initial mathematical analysis and simulation, we show that in an environment where copying is prone to error, quantitative polygenic traits that are shared within a parents' generation are transmitted to future generations under sexual reproduction with less deviation than under asexual reproduction. Furthermore, the model shows that this retention of common traits (abbr. RoCT), is driven by the very nature of mixing of parental traits, and occurs even before adding effects like trait-specific reproductive advantages, DNA repair, or the raising of reproductive barriers. Since survival of ecosystems depends on the ability of individuals to replace the networked interactions and interdependencies associated with failing, dying, or absent members of the same species, RoCT helps sustain species and ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.