ReviewBritish dental journal2025
The long-term oral health consequences of an amalgam phase-out.
Review in British dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- EFCD Expert Non-Consensus on Material and Technique Use for Direct Class II Composites With Guidance on Restoring Complex Cavities.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2026Article
- Can fiber reinforcement enhance the load-bearing capacity of self-adhesive restorative materials? An in vitro study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Restorations: Amalgam Dominates.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- Amalgam versus composite restorations: a cost-consequence analysis.British dental journal · 2026Article
- Experts' Willingness to Restore With Direct Composite: Complexity, Cuspal Coverage, and Techniques.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2026Article
- Use of Amalgam and Composite Restorations Among 12-Year-Old Children in Israel: A Retrospective Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dental Amalgam Phase-Down-Status, Alternatives, Strategies and Preparedness for Implementation: A Review.International journal of dentistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the long-term oral health implications of an amalgam phase-out is complex. However, amalgam is a simpler, cheaper, quicker, more predictable and effective material to place and replace than composite, which is the main alternative. It also has fewer postoperative complications in United Kingdom (UK) primary care and has been shown to be more cost-effective over a lifetime. Existing economic evaluations are limited, however, with rudimentary models which fail to consider clinicians and patients, and likely significantly underestimate the broader costs of placing composite compared to amalgam. Amalgam alternatives require improvement and their environmental impacts require characterisation. Composite restorations can be successful in extensive cavities, but they require much technical skill and expensive and time-consuming specialised equipment, which are not being commonly used in UK primary care, especially by National Health Service (NHS) dentists. Postgraduate composite education is not generally making UK clinicians confident when faced with difficult cavities and requires improvement. Expert consensus on the use of techniques to restore varying cavity presentations with composite would help to guide this, while also considering how its dissemination could be improved. NHS clinician fees are significantly lower than in Europe. The NHS system therefore essentially incentives the use of amalgam and disincentivises the use of expensive and time-consuming recommended equipment for composite restorations. This has likely contributed to a failure of clinicians to upskill and be confident in providing posterior composite restorations safely. These issues, alongside a loss of trust, have led to dentists leaving the NHS, which has created access issues for patients, disproportionately affecting the most at need in society. An amalgam phase-out would almost certainly exacerbate this issue, widening existing health inequalities while not providing restoration characteristics which the most affected patients most value. Failure to urgently address these issues risks an oral health crisis in the UK if amalgam is imminently phased out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.