Trial reportScientific reports2025
Time required to achieve optimum viral load suppression with Ravidasvir/sofosbuvir in chronic hepatitis C patients with or without compensated cirrhosis.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time to viral load suppression with 8-week versus 12-week ravidasvir/sofosbuvir regimens among chronic hepatitis C patients in Malaysia: a non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Serum Gremlin 1 Remains Elevated Following Successful Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C.Viruses · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A study indicated that ravidasvir (RDV) has excellent safety and tolerability when used with sofosbuvir (SOF) to treat chronic HCV infection. The aim of this study was to determine the time taken by RDV/SOF to achieve optimum viral load suppression in chronic hepatitis C patients with or without compensated cirrhosis. Data from the open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase II/III clinical trial (STORM-C-1) were utilized. Time‒to-event analysis via Kaplan-Meier curves was performed to determine the time required to achieve optimum viral load suppression in both the cirrhotic and noncirrhotic groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of achieving suppression within four and eight weeks. The time to achieve optimum viral load suppression ranged from six to 85 days and from five to 148 days among noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients, respectively. Among noncirrhotic patients, 80.6% achieved optimum viral load suppression within 4 weeks, and 92.6% achieved this within 8 weeks. Among cirrhotic patients, 76.1% and 90.4% achieved optimum viral load suppression within 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Notably, optimum viral load suppression differs from sustained virological response (SVR12), which is defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after treatment completion. While the study demonstrates promising early viral suppression, it does not evaluate the efficacy of a shortened regimen. Further research is needed to assess whether shorter treatment durations maintain high SVR12 rates without compromising treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.