ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on load forecasting based on CEEMDAN SE VMD and SelfAttention TCN fusion model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A time series based dynamic prediction model for loess mudstone landslides.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Short-term load forecasting using a metaheuristic optimized temporal fusion transformer with decomposition technique.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of increasing electricity consumption and the growing complexity of energy usage patterns, accurate power load forecasting faces more significant challenges. Given the widespread demand for precise load curve prediction, this paper proposes a CEEMDAN-SE-VMD + SelfAttention-TCN Fusion model. Load curves contain rich information, and comprehensive information mining contributes to prediction accuracy. Specifically, the methodology first employs Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN) to decompose the load curve, where the resulting Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) are adaptively categorized into high and low-frequency components using Sample Entropy (SE). The high-frequency components undergo further extraction through Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), while the low-frequency components are directly utilized as model inputs without additional processing. Through this process, the original load curve is reconstructively expressed as sequences of high and low-frequency components. These reconstructed sequences are then fed into Self-Attention Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) for prediction, and the individual predictions are integrated to generate the final forecast. Using historical German power load data from ENTSO for case analysis, the model achieves an Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 24.1293 (MW), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 17.268 (MW), and R-square of 0.9838, surpassing the prediction accuracy of other comparative models. Experimental results reveal that the signal decomposition and reconstruction process enables more effective expression of deep characteristic information inherent in load data, thereby enhancing model learning performance. Furthermore, the self-attention mechanism strengthens TCN's ability to capture data dependencies. The proposed model demonstrates both a high tolerance for raw load data and superior prediction accuracy, with experimental validation confirming its excellent performance in real-world short-term power load forecasting applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.