Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281078›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Valorization of nano additives effects on the physical, mechanical and radiation shielding properties of high strength concrete.

Mohamed A Abouelnour, Islam N Fathy, Alaa A Mahmoud, Mansour Alturki, Mohamed M Abdelaziz, Sahar A Mostafa, K A Mahmoud, Hany A Dahish, Islam M Nabil, Mohy S Fattouh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dual-function polyurethane-based CdO- BScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed A AbouelnourCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Islam N FathyCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Alaa A MahmoudCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Mansour AlturkiDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, 52571, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia. m.alturki@qu.edu.sa.
Mohamed M AbdelazizCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Sahar A MostafaCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
K A MahmoudUral Federal University, 19 Mira St, 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Hany A DahishDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, 52571, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Islam M NabilPhysics Department, Faculty of Science, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Mohy S FattouhCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Sinai University, Arish, Egypt.

Funding

Qassim University QU-APC-2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of nano silica (NS) and nano metakaolin (NMK) on high-strength concrete (HSC). Portland cement was partially replaced with varying amounts of NS and NMK, both individually and in combination. Portland cement was partially replaced with varying percentages (1, 2, 3, and 4 wt%) of NS and (2, 4 and 6 wt%) of NMK in individual mixes. Four concrete mixtures were formulated using a combination of NS and NMK. The physical properties (slump, consistency, and setting times), mechanical properties (compressive and tensile strengths at 28 days), and microstructural analysis (X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX)) were conducted on both the individual and combined mixtures, along with the control mix. Radiation shielding properties of the concrete were conducted. The Monte Carlo simulation code and the Phy-X program were used to examine the efficacy of these combinations in shielding against ionizing radiation, e.g., gamma rays and fast neutrons. The results showed NS and NMK reduced slump in HSC, primarily due to increased water demand and a denser structure. Combined use led to a more significant reduction than individual. Increased NS and NMK content led to higher water demand but shorter setting times. NS improved compressive and tensile strengths, reaching a maximum of 10.5% and 5.6%, respectively, at replacement 3% NS. NMK increased compressive and tensile strengths of 11.7% and 6.3%, respectively at replacement 4% NMK. The combined mixture 1% NS + 4% NMK mixture, demonstrated enhancement in compressive and tensile strengths by 14.2% and 7.7%, respectively, compared to the control mix. XRD and EDX analyses confirmed that NS and NMK enhanced the formation of calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminate hydrate through pozzolanic reactions. The linear attenuation of the concrete samples was NMK4 < CM2 < NS3 < C0. The sample containing NMK demonstrated the best value for the linear attenuation coefficient of gamma rays and a rise in FCS, indicating that it is an excellent barrier against both gamma rays and neutrons. These findings demonstrate that NS and NMK significantly enhance HSC strength and radiation shielding, offering safer and more durable concrete for nuclear and medical facilities.

Indexed as

High strength concreteMechanical propertiesNano particlesRadiation shielding

Identifiers

PMID40281078
PMCPMC12032053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.