ArticleScientific reports2025
Valorization of nano additives effects on the physical, mechanical and radiation shielding properties of high strength concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation shielding and microstructural characteristics of nano-silica and nano-alumina modified cement composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-scale mechanistic evaluation of reactivity balance in metakaolin-nano-CaCOScientific reports · 2026Article
- Sustainable Concrete Production Using Granodiorite, Alkali Feldspar Granite, and Mafic Metavolcanic Rock Powders as Supplementary Cementitious Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanical properties and chemical synergistic mechanism of lithium slag concrete under mechanical-chemical activation conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting compressive strength of mortars containing recycled CRT glass using GMDH and GEP methods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gamma-Ray Attenuation Performance of PEEK Reinforced with Natural Pumice and Palygorskite.Polymers · 2026Article
- Experimental and RSM simulation assessment of Gamma-ray shielding efficiency of nano-modified concrete exposed to elevated temperatures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Synergistic Influence of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Nanosilica Powder on Mechanical Performance of Mortar with Demolished Concrete Waste Aggregate and Polypropylene Fibers Addition Using Taguchi Design of Experiment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dual-function polyurethane-based CdO- BScientific reports · 2025Article
- Effective of prompt and delayed gamma emission on the nuclear radiation shielding effectiveness of prevalent natural minerals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Concrete Obtained with the Viterbo O'Reilly Method for Aggregate Gradation: A Potential Model for Sustainable Design and Reducing Development Costs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of rice husk biochar influence as a partial cement replacement material on the physical, mechanical, microstructural, and radiation shielding properties of ordinary concrete.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of nano silica (NS) and nano metakaolin (NMK) on high-strength concrete (HSC). Portland cement was partially replaced with varying amounts of NS and NMK, both individually and in combination. Portland cement was partially replaced with varying percentages (1, 2, 3, and 4 wt%) of NS and (2, 4 and 6 wt%) of NMK in individual mixes. Four concrete mixtures were formulated using a combination of NS and NMK. The physical properties (slump, consistency, and setting times), mechanical properties (compressive and tensile strengths at 28 days), and microstructural analysis (X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX)) were conducted on both the individual and combined mixtures, along with the control mix. Radiation shielding properties of the concrete were conducted. The Monte Carlo simulation code and the Phy-X program were used to examine the efficacy of these combinations in shielding against ionizing radiation, e.g., gamma rays and fast neutrons. The results showed NS and NMK reduced slump in HSC, primarily due to increased water demand and a denser structure. Combined use led to a more significant reduction than individual. Increased NS and NMK content led to higher water demand but shorter setting times. NS improved compressive and tensile strengths, reaching a maximum of 10.5% and 5.6%, respectively, at replacement 3% NS. NMK increased compressive and tensile strengths of 11.7% and 6.3%, respectively at replacement 4% NMK. The combined mixture 1% NS + 4% NMK mixture, demonstrated enhancement in compressive and tensile strengths by 14.2% and 7.7%, respectively, compared to the control mix. XRD and EDX analyses confirmed that NS and NMK enhanced the formation of calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminate hydrate through pozzolanic reactions. The linear attenuation of the concrete samples was NMK4 < CM2 < NS3 < C0. The sample containing NMK demonstrated the best value for the linear attenuation coefficient of gamma rays and a rise in FCS, indicating that it is an excellent barrier against both gamma rays and neutrons. These findings demonstrate that NS and NMK significantly enhance HSC strength and radiation shielding, offering safer and more durable concrete for nuclear and medical facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.