ArticleScientific reports2025
25(OH)D3 and F-25(OH)D as indicators of chronic kidney disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chronic kidney disease as an active driver of digestive tract tumors: mechanistic insights and emerging management strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency has been associated with the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), but its exact role in patients with RA and CKD remains unclear. This cross-sectional study explored the relationship of 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, and Free 25(OH)D [F-25(OH)D] with CKD progression in patients with RA. Patients with RA (n = 1514) were enrolled and divided into the mild, moderate, and severe CKD groups. Total 25(OH)D, 25(OH)D3, and F-25(OH)D in the moderate and severe CKD groups were lower than in the mild CKD group (all P < 0.05), while there were no differences in 25(OH)D2 levels (P = 0.095). As the severity of CKD progressed, total 25(OH)D, 25(OH)D3, and F-25(OH)D decreased (all Padj.<0.05). When progressing from moderate to severe CKD, only 25(OH)D3 decreased significantly (Padj.=0.014). Partial correlation and multiple logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between 25(OH)D3 and the progression of CKD deterioration, as did F-25(OH)D (all P < 0.05). Further seasonal stratified analysis showed that this correlation existed only in spring, summer, and autumn for 25(OH)D3 and only in spring and summer for F-25(OH)D (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the serum 25(OH)D3 and F-25(OH)D levels may be indicators of CKD progression in patients with RA to plan for timely intervention and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.