ArticleScientific reports2025
Associations of healthy lifestyle and accelerated aging with incident breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women: a population-based cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biological aging, circulating lipid biomarkers and pancreatic diseases: a prospective cohort study based on the UK Biobank.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women. This study aimed to explore the association between healthy lifestyle, biological aging and breast cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women. This study included 125,579 participants. Biological aging was calculated using the PhenoAge algorithm. Cox regression models and counterfactual mediation analysis was utilized. During an average follow-up of 13.65 years, 5418 breast cancers occurred. In the overall women participants, compared to the healthy lifestyle group, the HR (95% CI) for unhealthy lifestyle regarding incident breast cancer was 1.28 (1.13, 1.33). Compared to the lowest tertile of accelerated aging (AA), the HR (95% CI) for the highest tertile regarding breast cancer risk was 1.22 (1.14, 1.30). Consistent results observed only in postmenopausal participants. The joint effect of a healthy lifestyle and AA on breast cancer risk was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The AA-mediated breast cancer risk ratio was 17.69 (95% CI 8.19, 27.19) when comparing healthy to unhealthy lifestyles. In the study, healthy lifestyle and lower levels of AA were significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, particularly among postmenopausal women. In addition, AA mediated 17.02-17.69% of the link between lifestyle and breast cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.