ArticleScientific reports2025
Multiple-to-single maximum power point tracking for empowering conventional MPPT algorithms under partial shading conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy optimization of PV systems under partial shading conditions using various technique-based MPPT methods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive regulation of a non inverting buck boost converter with Levenberg Marquardt based sliding mode predictive control scheme.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Partial shading conditions (PSC) in photovoltaic (PV) systems degrade energy harvest by generating multi-peak power-voltage (P-V) curves, trapping conventional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms at local maxima. This paper presents a Multi-Peak to Single-Peak Conversion (MSMPPT) framework that enables conventional algorithms like Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC) to reliably track the global maximum power point (GMPP) under PSC without structural modifications. The framework operates via two stages: dynamic estimation of optimal voltage boundaries to shrink the GMPP search space to under 10% of the original P-V range, and active voltage regulation to enforce operation within this zone, effectively transforming the multi-peak curve into a single-peak profile. The proposed MSMPP-P&O and MSMPP-INC algorithms achieve 50% faster tracking (64 ms vs. 122 ms for P&O) and near-perfect steady-state efficiency under static shading, reducing power losses below 2%. In dynamic shading scenarios with abrupt irradiance shifts, MSMPPT maintains robustness with less than 1.5 W net loss, outperforming conventional methods that incur over 30 W of power losses. By eliminating oscillations and hotspot risks through voltage regulation, the framework retains algorithmic simplicity while enhancing performance under complex shading scenarios. Validated across benchmark shading profiles, MSMPPT demonstrates fidelity without requiring additional hardware or complex optimizers. This innovation bridges the gap between conventional MPPT simplicity and partial shading resilience, offering a cost-effective, scalable solution to boost PV system reliability in shading environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.