ArticleScientific reports2025
A pioneering artificial intelligence tool to predict treatment outcomes in ovarian cancer via diagnostic laparoscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian pathophysiology and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning assisting the surgical management of gynecologic cancers.Current opinion in oncology · 2026Review
- From Image-Guided Surgery to Computer-Assisted Real-Time Diagnosis with Hyperspectral and Multispectral Imaging: A Systematic Review in Gynecologic Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer prevention and control: a brief review of detection, treatment, and equity (2021-2026).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Research progress of artificial intelligence in the early screening, diagnosis, precise treatment and prognosis prediction of three central gynecological malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- A Predictive Model Based on Machine Learning Algorithm for Vein Thrombosis After Ovarian Cancer Resection.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is associated with high rates of patient mortality and morbidity. Laparoscopic assessment of tumor localization can be used for treatment planning in newly diagnosed high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). While spread to multiple intra-abdominal areas is correlated with worse outcomes, whether other morphological tumor differences are also associated with patient outcomes is unknown. Given the large volume of visual information in laparoscopic videos, we investigated whether deep-learning models can capture implicit features and predict treatment outcomes. We developed a novel deep-learning framework using pre-treatment laparoscopic images to assess clinical outcomes following upfront standard treatment, defined as short progression-free survival (PFS) (< 8 months) or long PFS (> 12 months). The deep-learning framework consisted of contrastive pre-training to capture morphological features of images and a location-aware transformer to predict patient-level treatment outcomes. We trained and extensively evaluated the model using cross-validation and analyzed the extracted features via UMAP visualizations and Grad-CAM saliency maps. The model reached an AUROC of 0.819 (± 0.119) on fivefold cross-validation and an out-of-fold AUROC of 0.807 on the whole dataset, successfully discriminating between patients with short PFS and long PFS using only laparoscopic images. Our approach demonstrates the potential of deep learning to simplify HGSOC triage and improve early treatment planning by accurately stratifying the patients based on minimally invasive laparoscopy at the diagnostic stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.