Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40280978›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improved multi-objective decision-making in manufacturing processes through uncertainty quantification and robust pareto front modelling.

Arne De Temmerman, Mathias Verbeke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arne De TemmermanM-Group, Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. arne.detemmerman@kuleuven.be.
Mathias VerbekeM-Group, Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

KU Leuven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) STG/21/057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manufacturing processes often exhibit complex relationships between input parameters and output responses, posing challenges for optimization and decision-making. Surrogate models are commonly employed to approximate these relationships, enabling efficient exploration of the design space. However, the presence of uncertainty can lead to suboptimal decisions and inaccurate predictions. This paper explores using Probabilistic Graphical Models to represent manufacturing processes, integrating expert knowledge with data-driven approximations of unknown relations. We investigate the impact of aleatoric uncertainty on multi-objective optimization, demonstrating enhanced Pareto front creation and improved decision-making under non-linear process functions. The methodology is applied to a continuous manufacturing case, where probabilistic surrogate sampling generates a more conservative setpoint. Our findings demonstrate that incorporating aleatoric uncertainty into surrogate modelling leads to more reliable and robust decision-making in manufacturing optimization.

Indexed as

Decision-makingManufacturing processesMulti-objectiveRobust optimizationUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID40280978
PMCPMC12032147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.