ArticleScientific reports2025
Design of a multi-epitope vaccine against Staphylococcus Aureus lukotoxin ED using in silico approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of a multi-epitope Staphylococcus aureus vaccine integrating a protein A variant, α-hemolysin, and fibronectin-binding protein A through reverse vaccinology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A mutation-aware proteomics approach for designing a multi-epitope vaccine against multidrug-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- In silico design of the multi-epitope vaccine for lung adenocarcinoma based on hub gene-derived neoantigens.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatics based designing of a broad-spectrum multi-epitope vaccine against co-infection of human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza A virus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AntiPan: a genome-informed in silico pipeline for advancing subunit vaccine discovery against Staphylococcus aureus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of a strategy to combat Staphylococcus aureus is a high priority for the World Health Organization. B cell and helper T lymphocyte (HTL) epitopes of leukotoxin ED (LukED) were predicted using computational tools. The predicted epitopes were screened for conservancy, allergenicity, toxicity, autoreactivity, and population coverage. The immunogenic regions of LukED were linked together and to Human β-defensin 3 (hBD3) as adjuvant with appropriate linkers. The predicted 3D structure of the vaccine validated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Subsequently, the 3D structure was docked with the Toll-like receptor (TLR)1/2 to evaluate the binding capacity of the adjuvant. Finally, MD simulation was employed to characterizing the conformational dynamics and stability of this interaction. The predicted epitopes were found to be non-toxic and non-allergenic, with no homology to the human proteome. The vaccine demonstrated a population coverage of 65.15% globally. It was composed of the immunogenic regions of LukED. Molecular docking and MD simulation indicated a stable interaction between hBD3 in the vaccine and TLR1/2 during the simulation period. We have designed vaccine against S. aureus LukED that targets epitope-rich regions, which helps maintain a native-like conformation. This work lays the groundwork for further experimental studies to evaluate the vaccine's neutralizing effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.